Reducing energy usage in senior living

Reduce energy usage in senior housing across your portfolio with practical steps to compare sites, lower costs, and protect resident comfort.

How to reduce energy usage in senior housing without compromising resident comfort

Energy costs are hard to manage in senior living because your buildings run all day, care teams need reliable systems, and residents feel changes quickly. The goal is to reduce utility bills and improve efficiency while maintaining good lighting, air quality, safety, and accessibility intact.

Senior care buildings are energy-intensive: benchmarked senior care facilities show median energy use around 1.2 GJ per square metre, which is higher than offices at 1.1 GJ/m² and about one-third higher than retail and schools at 0.9 GJ/m².

Understand why energy usage is high in senior living buildings

If you manage several retirement homes, nursing homes, or assisted living facilities, you need to know which sites are actually driving high energy costs. A high bill can come from usage, weather, care intensity, delivery charges, demand charges, contract timing, or a billing issue.

Start by building a comparable energy baseline across your portfolio. For senior care facilities, that means 12 to 24 months of data across every facility, account, and fuel type.

Your baseline should include:

  • Facility details, including floor area, care model, licensed beds, occupancy, kitchen, laundry, and HVAC system type
  • Account and meter details, including utility, retailer, energy type, billing period, and service period
  • Standardized usage units and reporting periods
  • Site energy use intensity (EUI), source EUI, cost per square metre, cost per bed, usage per bed, and emissions per bed
  • Cost breakdowns for commodity, delivery, demand, fixed, tax, regulatory, carbon-related charges, adjustments, and credits

This is the first step in energy management in senior living facilities. Without a clean baseline, you won’t be able to compare facilities fairly.

Benchmark senior care facilities before choosing what to fix

Energy efficiency in senior living is about prioritization. Instead of trying to optimize every building at once, identify which facilities deserve attention first.

Avoid ranking every property solely by total annual spend. A large mixed-use campus will usually use more total energy than a smaller long-term care home, but that does not mean it is performing worse.

Once your baseline is in place, compare similar facilities and flag the worst-performing 10% to 25% based on normalized cost, usage, or emissions intensity. For a deeper breakdown of senior living energy usage, you can use a portfolio-level framework to separate cost, consumption, emissions, and facility context before deciding what to fix.

That shortlist becomes your first group of sites to investigate. From there, you can move into the next step: identifying energy waste, separating low-risk actions from higher-risk ones, and fixing the issues that are driving cost.

Fix operational energy waste in high-use systems first

The fastest savings often come from operating the systems you already have more effectively. This is where reducing energy consumption in care homes can be lower risk than a major equipment project.

Energy consumption in senior facilities usually concentrates in heating, hot water, HVAC, ventilation, lighting, and controls. Benchmarking data shows natural gas supplies roughly 55 percent of total energy use in Canadian senior living buildings, while electricity supplies about 41 percent.

Start with the systems that use the most energy:

  • HVAC and ventilation: schedules that run at full output in lightly used spaces, simultaneous heating and cooling, outdated ventilation settings, or controls that need review
  • Domestic hot water and laundry: recirculation running harder than needed, inefficient setpoints, poor pipe insulation, or equipment running outside actual service needs
  • Lighting and controls: corridor, common area, and exterior lighting running longer than necessary, or controls that are missing or poorly tuned
  • Envelope: air leakage, window issues, or insulation gaps that increase heating and cooling loads

Monthly bills are lagging indicators. By the time a bill reveals a problem, your facility may have already paid for weeks of avoidable waste.

A clearer energy view can help you catch unusual usage patterns, cost spikes, or site-level changes earlier, and then decide whether the issue needs a bill review, schedule check, contract review, or deeper facilities investigation.

Balance energy reduction with resident comfort

Energy cost reduction in senior housing has to protect resident comfort. The goal is to balance both: reduce waste while maintaining thermal comfort, indoor air quality, lighting quality, and safe movement.

Care facilities have long operating hours, safety requirements, and higher comfort expectations than many commercial buildings. Some energy actions are low risk. Others need careful review before implementation.

Energy actions and resident comfort considerations

Energy actionSavings opportunityResident comfort or care riskResident comfort guardrail
Adjust HVAC schedules in offices, admin areas, and lightly used common spacesHighLowLimit schedule changes to non-resident spaces unless comfort needs are reviewed.
Correct simultaneous heating and coolingHighLowReview controls first so fixes do not create hot or cold zones.
Review ventilation settingsMediumMediumMaintain indoor air quality and infection-control requirements.
Optimize domestic hot water recirculationMediumMediumProtect bathing, laundry, cleaning, and temperature requirements.
Add or tune lighting controlsMediumLowKeep care areas, corridors, bathrooms, and entrances safely lit.
Reduce temperature setpoints broadlyMediumHighAvoid blanket changes across resident areas.
Shut equipment off aggressivelyMediumHighConfirm the equipment is not needed for comfort, care, safety, or backup.

Build a repeatable energy management process

Energy optimization for senior living facilities should become a routine operating process, not a one-time project. A useful model is Plan-Do-Check-Act, the continual improvement framework used in ISO 50001 energy management systems.

For a senior care portfolio, that can be simple:

  • Plan: Build the baseline, identify outlier facilities, and select the initial actions.
  • Do: Implement low-risk operational fixes, such as schedule reviews, controls corrections, or lighting adjustments.
  • Check: Compare usage, cost, and comfort feedback against the baseline.
  • Act: Keep what worked, adjust what did not, and decide what to scale across other sites.

This keeps energy management practical. It also helps your team avoid one-off fixes that never become part of normal operations.

Scale senior living energy savings across your portfolio

The safest path is to begin with data, fix operational issues first, and use capital projects where the case is clear. That gives you cost optimization without guessing.

For most portfolios, the starting point is simple: build a clean baseline, compare similar facilities, flag the first group of normalized outliers, and investigate the cause before taking action.

That is how to reduce energy usage in senior living while protecting comfort, sustainability, and resident care. For multi-site operators who need a clearer view of utility data, costs, emissions, and savings opportunities across facilities, Jotson’s energy management platform can help bring that work into one portfolio view.

Browse more articles

Make the most informed energy decisions for your home

Dark Apps

Apple App Store Google App Store Apple App Store Google App Store